skip to content

concept page · founder review required

for practices

We are exploring how AI and digital tools can support architects with documentation, visual communication and dossier preparation. The architect retains professional review and decision-making.

These tools are planned or under investigation and are not yet available as standalone products. Architecture for building clients remains the practice's core work; see the services page.

01 · process hypothesis

Dossier readiness check

problem
As a dossier grows, missing material, document versions and open questions become difficult to trace quickly.
proposed output
A source-linked inventory of missing information, uncertainty and a summary for further professional assessment.
required input
A defined set of project documents, project data and an agreed municipality or context.
professional review
The architect reviews the findings and decides which corrections or next steps are required. Approval is never guaranteed.
stage
Planned tool · interest in a bounded pilot

02 · process hypothesis

Visual decision pack

problem
Design options are hard to compare when images, assumptions and comments are not presented as one decision set.
proposed output
Consistent, labelled illustrative views and annotated options tied to the supplied project information.
required input
A model or sketch, selected viewpoints, material direction and the decisions the pack needs to support.
professional review
Every output remains clearly labelled as illustrative until geometry and project information have been professionally checked.
stage
Planned tool · workflow and rights still to be confirmed

03 · process hypothesis

Document consistency check

problem
Differences across drawings, schedules and revisions can be missed when each document is reviewed in isolation.
proposed output
A located list of discrepancies, source references and questions that cannot yet be answered with confidence.
required input
Compatible drawing and schedule exports, clear version numbers and a comparison scope agreed in advance.
professional review
The tool flags possible discrepancies; a professional assesses their meaning, impact and required correction.
stage
Research candidate · no available product yet

Explore a bounded workflow?

Share the recurring problem, the available source material and who performs the professional review. We first assess whether a small pilot is useful.

register interest in a pilot